community bean owners receive a questionnaire

Recently, located in chaoyang district GeZhuang township multiple community bean owners receive a questionnaire. The questionnaire involving residents for the government functional departments of service quality, urban image content of the evaluation. To make it strangely, questionnaire answers are already fill in, and most are "satisfied", "understanding" and "support" and so on vocabulary. To this, chaoyang district WenMingBan staff township GeZhuang beans, said this questionnaire is striving to welcome the chaoyang district the third assessment urban civilization according to the standard, hope residents can answer to inspectors' questions, if not satisfied with also not importune residents. (new andmorecomfortable "April 25)
There is nothing new under the sun, beans GeZhuang practice is not origination, the township in early 2009, jiangsu province in order to succeed in the jiangdu comprehensive well-off acceptance polls smoothly through, who also had issued by a similar to residents "suggested the answer". If again linked to people's government website YongJiXian jilin province last year a "not satisfied is very satisfactory" satisfaction survey, would find this "express satisfaction for the public the phenomenon of", is already some local governments commonplace practice.
Essentially, "for public expression satisfaction" is the name of respect in the desecration of public opinion. Namely on the surface is public opinion, is actually in the collection in "conscientious ZouGuoChang", it is to give of superior Tory Burch Flip Flops,leadership of check create a false poll results, in this process, the party is always about public opinion eyes look upwards instead of eyes look down. The implication is that I send you "suggested the answer", according to "the advice you to answer is certainly answer" happy, even if not in accordance with the "suggest the answer" to answer is insignificant.
This is the problem. By rights, "suggested the answer" itself shows that accept investigation citizen, could not answer according to "suggested" proposal to answer, even received "suggested the answer" citizen, could give "suggested the answer" as "Tory burch outlet tried to forge opinion" evidence, all provide higher investigation organization. In opinion can fully respect the context of providing "Suggestions, no matter how the answer" agood sufficient reason, higher institutions can take "a ticket to a client, make its veto", and come home shorn.
According to this logic, won't someone would be foolish to cramming hair "suggested the answer" point, Tory Burch Handbags and should be through his daily every practical action to provide public "suggested the answer", but the question now is, some top-down investigation just also is not to truly survey, just need a public opinion poll the parameters of the just. This kind of circumstance, some polls, became all the way up and down the "dress rehearsal," cried foul rehearsal in "key see who fared better,". Even in "the" in "rehearsals to play performance", but also "performance hit the incident, but not to the audience of disrespect.
Say so, "suggested the answer", is actually the public right behind lack of portraiture. When the public no full expression of discontent, and the power to right into collective accountability, opinion it is at most a at a very marginal situation "adornment", can let the public with "was successfully satisfaction" performance of course is very good, but didn't also hinder the big picture.