Day television gala is literature

As rational man, we should yang wuwu blog distinguish the criticism and the spoiled brat distinction, have the audacity is a good thing, but can't have the audacity to not reasonable, will himself dressed as the incarnation of the truth, is everywhere disorderly bats - you said literature, he said person, you say is the person, he said, you say that science scientific literature, he again go to say... Anyhow, always true, control the commanding heights forever.

"If you always get cctv1 cast exchanged views of the gang, both literary ideas, a lack of motivation, lack, lack of creativity, and the lack of opinions modestly character, must make not cctv1." Recently, the ministry spokesman in the original WangXuMing writing blog again, but the truth "cctv1 cctv1 denounced for growing children's negative effects were too big."

Criticism never need, but this kind of expression way too rich dra-matic color.

First, criticism coping things not people, can specify programming, force, lack of innovation etc, can "lack of an idea", "a lack of motivation," and "lack of x character" etc, rather ZhuXinZhiLun, character, who can recordation how? If the problem really is here, who can guarantee the creator of the future personality sound? evening party, without "make literary the gang", don't must depend on the sage, both by moralists and by educators? Such "writing carry doctrine" type of JiaDaoXue and how good shit?

Second, literary and art works shall bear the social responsibility, can this "negative impact" what size is it? If no objective evaluation standard, only by individual impressions it rouses, some arbitrary. WangXuMing can endorse the growing children? If affliction, holds, then so many parents complain, was not caused by the education ministry "negative impact" is also big? Whether the education on make again the many gang also "must make not"?

Literature and art have own rules, historically, "monkey" for this game mastepiece, also lack of thought ", "a dream of red mansions" had no thought of readers' feeling, more "lack of motivation," satiring fictions to peer wantonly sarcasm, very not "modestly", but these not all became handed down classical?

The crux of the problem is that as rational man, we should distinguish the criticism and the spoiled brat distinction, have the audacity is a good thing, but can't have the audacity to not reasonable, will himself dressed as the incarnation of the truth, is everywhere disorderly bats - you said literature, he said person, you say is the person, he said, you say that science scientific literature, he again go to say... Anyhow, always true, control the commanding heights forever.

No logical process, no clear position, no prudent approach, this criticism is common to all the role, cough, tell a loudly small children, this is still a ye? Give me immediately shut up... This, is no longer a comment, but to show off power.

No wonder MaDong sir want to send thunder fury, because tsinghua professor broken "rules", in not own mu of land, and the WangXuMing utter chaos denounced, then indicates the: the ans literacy scold you, you still dare to answer? You "make literary the gang"! Come and go, actually are power the product of culture, so total also discuss the not clear problem, leaving only cheap anger and non-nutritious slogan.

Exchange a big ye snowboarding progresses, making a lot, so that when it does not increase emotional garbage thickening sternness of IQ only curse angrily, have he yiyi? Or, really this will reflection is, what made debate narrow-mindedness? When we can learn to criticism?